Thursday, March 04, 2010

Rockefeller introduces legislation to suspend EPA action on greenhouse gases

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — U.S. Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va., today introduced legislation to suspend potential Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulation of greenhouse gases from stationary sources for two years. 

    “Today, we took important action to safeguard jobs, the coal industry, and the entire economy as we move toward clean coal technology,” said Rockefeller. “This legislation will issue a two year suspension on EPA regulation of greenhouse gases from stationary sources—giving Congress the time it needs to address an issue as complicated and expansive as our energy future. Congress, not the EPA, must be the ideal decision-maker on such a challenging issue.

    “Two weeks ago, I sent a letter to EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson challenging EPA’s potential regulation of greenhouse gases. Administrator Jackson responded quickly and showed some willingness to move the agency’s timetable for regulation to the end of 2010. This is a positive change and good progress, but I am concerned it may not be enough time. We must set this delay in stone and give Congress enough time to consider a comprehensive energy bill to develop the clean coal technologies we need. At a time when so many people are hurting, we need to put decisions about clean coal and our energy future into the hands of the people and their elected representatives, not a federal environmental agency.” 

    Congressman Nick Rahall (D-WV) is introducing the House of Representatives companion legislation, with Reps. Alan Mollohan (D-WV) and Rick Boucher (D-VA) as cosponsors.

    “I am dead-set against the EPA’s plowing ahead on its own with new regulations to limit greenhouse gas emissions from coal-fired power plants,” Rahall said. “This is reasonable and responsible legislation that will protect a vital industry – coal – and essential jobs for West Virginia and the Nation.”

    “EPA must be stopped from moving further down this very dangerous road – one that would throw West Virginians out of work and increase energy prices for all Americans,” Mollohan said. “Climate change will remain deeply controversial, but our approach is the only one that has a chance of bringing all sides together to stop what most everyone agrees is a very bad idea – EPA pushing ahead with its own regulations.”

    “EPA regulation of greenhouse gases would be the worst outcome for the coal industry and coal related jobs,” Boucher said. “Our bill is a responsible, achievable approach which prevents the EPA from enacting regulations that would harm coal and gives Congress time to establish a balanced program.”

    In 2007, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide could be considered pollutants and gave the EPA the power to regulate them under the Clean Air Act. In the absence of legislation, the EPA has the power – and is legally mandated by the Supreme Court – to step in and address carbon emissions. 

    In response to that court mandate, the EPA has plotted a course for regulating carbon emissions from vehicles and stationary sources. Accordingly, the plan for stationary sources would hit large emitters – like coal-burning power plants – up front, while smaller emitters would be addressed later. 

    To address the near-term challenges to coal posed by the planned EPA regulation, Rahall, Mollohan, and Boucher are proposing a two-year suspension of EPA’s regulatory authority for stationary sources.

    The legislation has received the support of the United Mine Workers of America.

No comments: